Airtable vs Roam Research
Which one should you choose? Here's how they compare.
| Feature | Airtable | Roam Research |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★ 4.5 | ★ 4.2 |
| Pricing | $20/mo | $15/mo |
| Type | freemium | paid |
| Company | Airtable | Roam Research |
| Founded | 2012 | 2017 |
Airtable Features
- •Tables
- •Views
- •Automations
- •Interface designer
Roam Research Features
- •Bi-directional links
- •Graph view
- •Daily notes
- •Queries
Airtable Pros
- ✓Visual and flexible
- ✓Good for databases
- ✓Rich field types
Airtable Cons
- ✗Can be expensive
- ✗Learning curve
- ✗Row limits free
Roam Research Pros
- ✓Pioneered networked notes
- ✓Great for research
- ✓Flexible
Roam Research Cons
- ✗Expensive
- ✗Learning curve
- ✗No mobile app
The Verdict
Airtable (by Airtable, founded 2012) and Roam Research (by Roam Research, founded 2017) both compete in the productivity space, but they serve slightly different needs. Both tools offer 4 core features, but their strengths differ. Airtable excels at tables, whereas Roam Research puts more emphasis on graph view. However, Airtable has a distinct advantage for Databases and Project tracking. On the other hand, Roam Research is better suited for Research and Knowledge management. Airtable is particularly popular among Teams and Operations, while Roam Research tends to attract Researchers and Academics. Airtable costs $20/mo (freemium), while Roam Research is priced at $15/mo (paid). Choose based on which pricing model aligns better with your budget. No tool is perfect. Airtable's main limitation is can be expensive, which might be a dealbreaker for some workflows. Meanwhile, Roam Research's biggest drawback is expensive. We recommend Airtable as the stronger overall choice (4.5 vs 4.2). It pulls ahead with stronger tables capabilities. However, if your workflow centers on bi-directional links, Roam Research remains a highly capable alternative.
- • You prioritize tables
- • You prioritize views
- • You prioritize bi-directional links
- • You prioritize graph view