Calendly vs Make
Which one should you choose? Here's how they compare.
| Feature | Calendly | Make |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★ 4.4 | ★ 4.3 |
| Pricing | $10/mo | $9/mo |
| Type | freemium | freemium |
| Company | Calendly | Make |
| Founded | 2013 | 2012 |
Calendly Features
- •Scheduling links
- •Calendar sync
- •Team scheduling
- •Integrations
Make Features
- •Visual builder
- •Complex workflows
- •Data transformation
- •1000+ apps
Calendly Pros
- ✓Easy scheduling
- ✓Good integrations
- ✓Professional
Calendly Cons
- ✗Limited free features
- ✗Can feel impersonal
- ✗Pricey for teams
Make Pros
- ✓More powerful than Zapier
- ✓Cheaper
- ✓Visual interface
Make Cons
- ✗Steeper learning curve
- ✗Can be confusing
- ✗Complex pricing
The Verdict
Calendly (by Calendly, founded 2013) and Make (by Make, founded 2012) both compete in the productivity space, but they serve slightly different needs. Both tools offer 4 core features, but their strengths differ. Calendly excels at scheduling links, whereas Make puts more emphasis on complex workflows. However, Calendly has a distinct advantage for Meeting scheduling and Sales calls. On the other hand, Make is better suited for Complex automation and Data processing. Calendly is particularly popular among Sales teams and Recruiters, while Make tends to attract Technical users and Developers. Both tools operate on a freemium model starting at $10/mo, making cost a non-factor in your decision. No tool is perfect. Calendly's main limitation is limited free features, which might be a dealbreaker for some workflows. Meanwhile, Make's biggest drawback is steeper learning curve. We recommend Calendly as the stronger overall choice (4.4 vs 4.3). It pulls ahead with stronger scheduling links capabilities. However, if your workflow centers on visual builder, Make remains a highly capable alternative.
- • You prioritize scheduling links
- • You prioritize calendar sync
- • You prioritize visual builder
- • You prioritize complex workflows