Figma vs Excalidraw
Which one should you choose? Here's how they compare.
| Feature | Figma | Excalidraw |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★ 4.7 | ★ 4.2 |
| Pricing | $15/mo | Free |
| Type | freemium | free |
| Company | Figma | Open Source |
| Founded | 2012 | 2020 |
Figma Features
- •UI design
- •Prototyping
- •Collaboration
- •AI plugins
Excalidraw Features
- •Hand-drawn style
- •Collaborative
- •End-to-end encryption
- •Open source
Figma Pros
- ✓Best for UI/UX
- ✓Real-time collaboration
- ✓Plugin ecosystem
Figma Cons
- ✗Learning curve
- ✗Can be slow
- ✗Paid for teams
Excalidraw Pros
- ✓Unique hand-drawn look
- ✓Free
- ✓Great collaboration
Excalidraw Cons
- ✗Limited design tools
- ✗No AI features
- ✗Basic functionality
The Verdict
Figma (by Figma, founded 2012) and Excalidraw (by Open Source, founded 2020) both compete in the design space, but they serve slightly different needs. Both tools offer 4 core features, but their strengths differ. Figma excels at ui design, whereas Excalidraw puts more emphasis on collaborative. Both Figma and Excalidraw are excellent for Prototyping. However, Figma has a distinct advantage for UI design and Design systems. On the other hand, Excalidraw is better suited for Sketching and Documentation. Figma is particularly popular among UI/UX designers and Product teams, while Excalidraw tends to attract Developers and Designers. Excalidraw offers a free tier, making it the more accessible option for individuals or small teams. Figma's freemium model starts at $15/mo. No tool is perfect. Figma's main limitation is learning curve, which might be a dealbreaker for some workflows. Meanwhile, Excalidraw's biggest drawback is limited design tools. We recommend Figma as the stronger overall choice (4.7 vs 4.2). It pulls ahead with stronger ui design capabilities. However, if your workflow centers on hand-drawn style, Excalidraw remains a highly capable alternative.
- • You prioritize ui design
- • You prioritize prototyping
- • You prioritize hand-drawn style
- • You prioritize collaborative