Framer vs Webflow
Which one should you choose? Here's how they compare.
| Feature | Framer | Webflow |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★ 4.3 | ★ 4.5 |
| Pricing | $5/mo | $14/mo |
| Type | freemium | freemium |
| Company | Framer | Webflow |
| Founded | 2014 | 2013 |
Framer Features
- •Website builder
- •AI design
- •Components
- •Animations
Webflow Features
- •Visual builder
- •CMS
- •Hosting
- •Interactions
Framer Pros
- ✓Great for websites
- ✓AI features
- ✓Modern design
Framer Cons
- ✗Learning curve
- ✗Can be slow
- ✗Limited CMS
Webflow Pros
- ✓Professional websites
- ✓Good CMS
- ✓No code needed
Webflow Cons
- ✗Learning curve
- ✗Can be expensive
- ✗Complex
The Verdict
Framer and Webflow are two of the most popular tools in the design category, but they take different approaches to solving the same problems. Framer, developed by Framer (founded 2014), is described as "website builder with ai-powered design tools.". Meanwhile, Webflow by Webflow (founded 2013) "visual website builder with cms and hosting.". In terms of overall user satisfaction, Webflow edges ahead with a rating of 4.5/5.0, compared to Framer's 4.3/5.0 — a difference of 0.2 points. Webflow's strongest advantages include professional websites, good cms, while Framer is praised for great for websites. Neither tool is perfect: Framer's main drawbacks include learning curve, can be slow, while Webflow users typically cite learning curve as its biggest limitation. However, Framer has an edge in website design, which might be the tiebreaker if that's important to you. In terms of target audience, Framer is particularly popular among designers and startups, while Webflow tends to attract designers and agencies. Our verdict: Webflow holds a slight edge, but the gap is narrow enough that both tools are worth trying. Start with the free tier of each and see which fits your workflow better.
- • You need great for websites
- • You need ai features
- • You need professional websites
- • You need good cms