Loom AI vs Make
Which one should you choose? Here's how they compare.
| Feature | Loom AI | Make |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★ 4.3 | ★ 4.3 |
| Pricing | $12.50/mo | $9/mo |
| Type | freemium | freemium |
| Company | Loom | Make |
| Founded | 2015 | 2012 |
Loom AI Features
- •Video recording
- •AI summaries
- •Auto chapters
- •Transcription
Make Features
- •Visual builder
- •Complex workflows
- •Data transformation
- •1000+ apps
Loom AI Pros
- ✓Easy async communication
- ✓AI features helpful
- ✓Good for teams
Loom AI Cons
- ✗Requires camera
- ✗AI features paid
- ✗Not for all communication
Make Pros
- ✓More powerful than Zapier
- ✓Cheaper
- ✓Visual interface
Make Cons
- ✗Steeper learning curve
- ✗Can be confusing
- ✗Complex pricing
The Verdict
Loom AI (by Loom, founded 2015) and Make (by Make, founded 2012) both compete in the productivity space, but they serve slightly different needs. Both tools offer 4 core features, but their strengths differ. Loom AI excels at video recording, whereas Make puts more emphasis on complex workflows. However, Loom AI has a distinct advantage for Team communication and Product demos. On the other hand, Make is better suited for Complex automation and Data processing. Loom AI is particularly popular among Remote teams and Sales teams, while Make tends to attract Technical users and Developers. Both tools operate on a freemium model starting at $12.50/mo, making cost a non-factor in your decision. No tool is perfect. Loom AI's main limitation is requires camera, which might be a dealbreaker for some workflows. Meanwhile, Make's biggest drawback is steeper learning curve. It's a tie. Both Loom AI and Make share the same 4.3 rating. We suggest trying both and picking the one that fits your daily workflow better.
- • You prioritize video recording
- • You prioritize ai summaries
- • You prioritize visual builder
- • You prioritize complex workflows