Loom vs Synthesia
Which one should you choose? Here's how they compare.
| Feature | Loom | Synthesia |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★ 4.4 | ★ 4.2 |
| Pricing | $12.50/mo | $22/mo |
| Type | freemium | paid |
| Company | Loom | Synthesia |
| Founded | 2015 | 2017 |
Loom Features
- •Screen recording
- •Video messages
- •Transcription
- •Comments
Synthesia Features
- •AI avatars
- •150+ avatars
- •120+ languages
- •Custom avatars
Loom Pros
- ✓Easy to use
- ✓Great for async
- ✓Good free tier
Loom Cons
- ✗Not for editing
- ✗AI features paid
- ✗Storage limits
Synthesia Pros
- ✓Professional quality
- ✓Multiple languages
- ✓No filming needed
Synthesia Cons
- ✗Expensive
- ✗Limited customization
- ✗Corporate feel
The Verdict
Loom (by Loom, founded 2015) and Synthesia (by Synthesia, founded 2017) both compete in the video space, but they serve slightly different needs. Both tools offer 4 core features, but their strengths differ. Loom excels at screen recording, whereas Synthesia puts more emphasis on 150+ avatars. However, Loom has a distinct advantage for Async communication and Tutorials. On the other hand, Synthesia is better suited for Training videos and Corporate comms. Loom is particularly popular among Remote teams and Educators, while Synthesia tends to attract Enterprises and L&D teams. Loom costs $12.50/mo (freemium), while Synthesia is priced at $22/mo (paid). Choose based on which pricing model aligns better with your budget. No tool is perfect. Loom's main limitation is not for editing, which might be a dealbreaker for some workflows. Meanwhile, Synthesia's biggest drawback is expensive. We recommend Loom as the stronger overall choice (4.4 vs 4.2). It pulls ahead with stronger screen recording capabilities. However, if your workflow centers on ai avatars, Synthesia remains a highly capable alternative.
- • You prioritize screen recording
- • You prioritize video messages
- • You prioritize ai avatars
- • You prioritize 150+ avatars