Make vs n8n
Which one should you choose? Here's how they compare.
| Feature | Make | n8n |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★ 4.3 | ★ 4.2 |
| Pricing | $9/mo | Free (self-hosted) |
| Type | freemium | free |
| Company | Make | n8n |
| Founded | 2012 | 2019 |
Make Features
- •Visual builder
- •Complex workflows
- •Data transformation
- •1000+ apps
n8n Features
- •Self-hosted
- •Open source
- •Visual editor
- •400+ integrations
Make Pros
- ✓More powerful than Zapier
- ✓Cheaper
- ✓Visual interface
Make Cons
- ✗Steeper learning curve
- ✗Can be confusing
- ✗Complex pricing
n8n Pros
- ✓Free self-hosted
- ✓Full control
- ✓Privacy focused
n8n Cons
- ✗Requires setup
- ✗Smaller community
- ✗Self-maintain
The Verdict
Make (by Make, founded 2012) and n8n (by n8n, founded 2019) both compete in the productivity space, but they serve slightly different needs. Both tools offer 4 core features, but their strengths differ. Make excels at visual builder, whereas n8n puts more emphasis on open source. However, Make has a distinct advantage for Complex automation and Data processing. On the other hand, n8n is better suited for Self-hosted automation and Privacy workflows. Make is particularly popular among Technical users and Developers, while n8n tends to attract Developers and Privacy-conscious teams. n8n offers a free tier, making it the more accessible option for individuals or small teams. Make's freemium model starts at $9/mo. No tool is perfect. Make's main limitation is steeper learning curve, which might be a dealbreaker for some workflows. Meanwhile, n8n's biggest drawback is requires setup. We recommend Make as the stronger overall choice (4.3 vs 4.2). It pulls ahead with stronger visual builder capabilities. However, if your workflow centers on self-hosted, n8n remains a highly capable alternative.
- • You prioritize visual builder
- • You prioritize complex workflows
- • You prioritize self-hosted
- • You prioritize open source