Obsidian vs Make
Which one should you choose? Here's how they compare.
| Feature | Obsidian | Make |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★ 4.6 | ★ 4.3 |
| Pricing | Free / $50/year sync | $9/mo |
| Type | free | freemium |
| Company | Dynalist | Make |
| Founded | 2020 | 2012 |
Obsidian Features
- •Markdown
- •Bidirectional links
- •Graph view
- •Plugins
Make Features
- •Visual builder
- •Complex workflows
- •Data transformation
- •1000+ apps
Obsidian Pros
- ✓Free for personal
- ✓Very flexible
- ✓Local files
Obsidian Cons
- ✗Learning curve
- ✗Sync costs
- ✗No collaboration free
Make Pros
- ✓More powerful than Zapier
- ✓Cheaper
- ✓Visual interface
Make Cons
- ✗Steeper learning curve
- ✗Can be confusing
- ✗Complex pricing
The Verdict
Obsidian (by Dynalist, founded 2020) and Make (by Make, founded 2012) both compete in the productivity space, but they serve slightly different needs. Both tools offer 4 core features, but their strengths differ. Obsidian excels at markdown, whereas Make puts more emphasis on complex workflows. However, Obsidian has a distinct advantage for Note-taking and Knowledge base. On the other hand, Make is better suited for Complex automation and Data processing. Obsidian is particularly popular among Researchers and Writers, while Make tends to attract Technical users and Developers. Obsidian offers a free tier, making it the more accessible option for individuals or small teams. Make's freemium model starts at $9/mo. No tool is perfect. Obsidian's main limitation is learning curve, which might be a dealbreaker for some workflows. Meanwhile, Make's biggest drawback is steeper learning curve. We recommend Obsidian as the stronger overall choice (4.6 vs 4.3). It pulls ahead with stronger markdown capabilities. However, if your workflow centers on visual builder, Make remains a highly capable alternative.
- • You prioritize markdown
- • You prioritize bidirectional links
- • You prioritize visual builder
- • You prioritize complex workflows