Play.ht vs Speechify
Which one should you choose? Here's how they compare.
| Feature | Play.ht | Speechify |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★ 4 | ★ 4 |
| Pricing | $31.20/mo | $139/year |
| Type | freemium | freemium |
| Company | Play.ht | Speechify |
| Founded | 2016 | 2017 |
Play.ht Features
- •Text-to-speech
- •Voice cloning
- •Podcast hosting
- •API
Speechify Features
- •Text-to-speech
- •Speed control
- •Mobile app
- •Chrome extension
Play.ht Pros
- ✓Very realistic voices
- ✓Good for podcasts
- ✓Multiple languages
Play.ht Cons
- ✗Expensive
- ✗Complex pricing
- ✗Slow generation
Speechify Pros
- ✓Great for reading
- ✓Mobile app
- ✓Speed control
Speechify Cons
- ✗Expensive yearly
- ✗Quality varies
- ✗Limited voices free
The Verdict
Play.ht (by Play.ht, founded 2016) and Speechify (by Speechify, founded 2017) both compete in the audio space, but they serve slightly different needs. Both tools offer 4 core features, but their strengths differ. Play.ht excels at text-to-speech, whereas Speechify puts more emphasis on speed control. However, Play.ht has a distinct advantage for Podcasts and Audiobooks. On the other hand, Speechify is better suited for Reading assistance and Accessibility. Play.ht is particularly popular among Podcasters and Content creators, while Speechify tends to attract Students and Professionals. Both tools operate on a freemium model starting at $31.20/mo, making cost a non-factor in your decision. No tool is perfect. Play.ht's main limitation is expensive, which might be a dealbreaker for some workflows. Meanwhile, Speechify's biggest drawback is expensive yearly. It's a tie. Both Play.ht and Speechify share the same 4 rating. We suggest trying both and picking the one that fits your daily workflow better.
- • You prioritize text-to-speech
- • You prioritize voice cloning
- • You prioritize text-to-speech
- • You prioritize speed control