Runway vs InVideo
Which one should you choose? Here's how they compare.
| Feature | Runway | InVideo |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★ 4.4 | ★ 4.1 |
| Pricing | $12-76/mo | $25/mo |
| Type | freemium | freemium |
| Company | Runway | InVideo |
| Founded | 2018 | 2019 |
Runway Features
- •Text-to-video
- •Image-to-video
- •Video editing
- •Green screen
InVideo Features
- •Templates
- •AI generation
- •Stock footage
- •Text-to-video
Runway Pros
- ✓Best video quality
- ✓Multiple AI tools
- ✓Professional features
Runway Cons
- ✗Short video clips
- ✗Expensive for heavy use
- ✗Learning curve
InVideo Pros
- ✓Many templates
- ✓Easy to use
- ✓Good for social
InVideo Cons
- ✗Watermark free
- ✗Limited AI
- ✗Can be slow
The Verdict
Runway (by Runway, founded 2018) and InVideo (by InVideo, founded 2019) both compete in the video space, but they serve slightly different needs. Both tools offer 4 core features, but their strengths differ. Runway excels at text-to-video, whereas InVideo puts more emphasis on ai generation. Both Runway and InVideo are excellent for Marketing. However, Runway has a distinct advantage for Video creation and Social media content. On the other hand, InVideo is better suited for Social media videos and Presentations. Runway is particularly popular among Video creators and Marketers, while InVideo tends to attract Marketers and Content creators. Both tools operate on a freemium model starting at $12-76/mo, making cost a non-factor in your decision. No tool is perfect. Runway's main limitation is short video clips, which might be a dealbreaker for some workflows. Meanwhile, InVideo's biggest drawback is watermark free. We recommend Runway as the stronger overall choice (4.4 vs 4.1). It pulls ahead with stronger text-to-video capabilities. However, if your workflow centers on templates, InVideo remains a highly capable alternative.
- • You prioritize text-to-video
- • You prioritize image-to-video
- • You prioritize templates
- • You prioritize ai generation