Todoist vs Make
Which one should you choose? Here's how they compare.
| Feature | Todoist | Make |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★ 4.4 | ★ 4.3 |
| Pricing | $4/mo | $9/mo |
| Type | freemium | freemium |
| Company | Doist | Make |
| Founded | 2007 | 2012 |
Todoist Features
- •Task management
- •Projects
- •Labels
- •Recurring tasks
Make Features
- •Visual builder
- •Complex workflows
- •Data transformation
- •1000+ apps
Todoist Pros
- ✓Simple and clean
- ✓Cross-platform
- ✓Good free tier
Todoist Cons
- ✗Limited free features
- ✗No time tracking
- ✗Basic collaboration
Make Pros
- ✓More powerful than Zapier
- ✓Cheaper
- ✓Visual interface
Make Cons
- ✗Steeper learning curve
- ✗Can be confusing
- ✗Complex pricing
The Verdict
Todoist (by Doist, founded 2007) and Make (by Make, founded 2012) both compete in the productivity space, but they serve slightly different needs. Both tools offer 4 core features, but their strengths differ. Todoist excels at task management, whereas Make puts more emphasis on complex workflows. However, Todoist has a distinct advantage for Personal tasks and Project management. On the other hand, Make is better suited for Complex automation and Data processing. Todoist is particularly popular among Individuals and Professionals, while Make tends to attract Technical users and Developers. Both tools operate on a freemium model starting at $4/mo, making cost a non-factor in your decision. No tool is perfect. Todoist's main limitation is limited free features, which might be a dealbreaker for some workflows. Meanwhile, Make's biggest drawback is steeper learning curve. We recommend Todoist as the stronger overall choice (4.4 vs 4.3). It pulls ahead with stronger task management capabilities. However, if your workflow centers on visual builder, Make remains a highly capable alternative.
- • You prioritize task management
- • You prioritize projects
- • You prioritize visual builder
- • You prioritize complex workflows