Todoist vs Microsoft To Do
Which one should you choose? Here's how they compare.
| Feature | Todoist | Microsoft To Do |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★ 4.4 | ★ 4 |
| Pricing | $4/mo | Free |
| Type | freemium | free |
| Company | Doist | Microsoft |
| Founded | 2007 | 2019 |
Todoist Features
- •Task management
- •Projects
- •Labels
- •Recurring tasks
Microsoft To Do Features
- •Tasks
- •Lists
- •Steps
- •Integration
Todoist Pros
- ✓Simple and clean
- ✓Cross-platform
- ✓Good free tier
Todoist Cons
- ✗Limited free features
- ✗No time tracking
- ✗Basic collaboration
Microsoft To Do Pros
- ✓Free
- ✓Microsoft integration
- ✓Simple
Microsoft To Do Cons
- ✗Basic features
- ✗Limited customization
- ✗No advanced features
The Verdict
Todoist (by Doist, founded 2007) and Microsoft To Do (by Microsoft, founded 2019) both compete in the productivity space, but they serve slightly different needs. Both tools offer 4 core features, but their strengths differ. Todoist excels at task management, whereas Microsoft To Do puts more emphasis on lists. However, Todoist has a distinct advantage for Personal tasks and Project management. On the other hand, Microsoft To Do is better suited for Simple tasks and Microsoft users. Todoist is particularly popular among Individuals and Professionals, while Microsoft To Do tends to attract Microsoft users and Casual users. Microsoft To Do offers a free tier, making it the more accessible option for individuals or small teams. Todoist's freemium model starts at $4/mo. No tool is perfect. Todoist's main limitation is limited free features, which might be a dealbreaker for some workflows. Meanwhile, Microsoft To Do's biggest drawback is basic features. We recommend Todoist as the stronger overall choice (4.4 vs 4). It pulls ahead with stronger task management capabilities. However, if your workflow centers on tasks, Microsoft To Do remains a highly capable alternative.
- • You prioritize task management
- • You prioritize projects
- • You prioritize tasks
- • You prioritize lists