Zapier vs Make
Which one should you choose? Here's how they compare.
| Feature | Zapier | Make |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★ 4.5 | ★ 4.3 |
| Pricing | $19.99/mo | $9/mo |
| Type | freemium | freemium |
| Company | Zapier | Make |
| Founded | 2011 | 2012 |
Zapier Features
- •App automation
- •AI actions
- •Multi-step workflows
- •5000+ integrations
Make Features
- •Visual builder
- •Complex workflows
- •Data transformation
- •1000+ apps
Zapier Pros
- ✓Most integrations
- ✓Easy to use
- ✓Powerful automation
Zapier Cons
- ✗Can be expensive
- ✗Learning curve
- ✗Rate limits free
Make Pros
- ✓More powerful than Zapier
- ✓Cheaper
- ✓Visual interface
Make Cons
- ✗Steeper learning curve
- ✗Can be confusing
- ✗Complex pricing
The Verdict
Zapier (by Zapier, founded 2011) and Make (by Make, founded 2012) both compete in the productivity space, but they serve slightly different needs. Both tools offer 4 core features, but their strengths differ. Zapier excels at app automation, whereas Make puts more emphasis on complex workflows. However, Zapier has a distinct advantage for Workflow automation and Data sync. On the other hand, Make is better suited for Complex automation and Data processing. Zapier is particularly popular among Businesses and Marketers, while Make tends to attract Technical users and Developers. Both tools operate on a freemium model starting at $19.99/mo, making cost a non-factor in your decision. No tool is perfect. Zapier's main limitation is can be expensive, which might be a dealbreaker for some workflows. Meanwhile, Make's biggest drawback is steeper learning curve. We recommend Zapier as the stronger overall choice (4.5 vs 4.3). It pulls ahead with stronger app automation capabilities. However, if your workflow centers on visual builder, Make remains a highly capable alternative.
- • You prioritize app automation
- • You prioritize ai actions
- • You prioritize visual builder
- • You prioritize complex workflows